Does Ed Miliband want to be Prime Minister?

Ed Miliband: This England in The SunIf Ed Miliband and David Cameron have both learned something terrible is coming before 2020 that they would rather be in Opposition than have to deal with as Prime Minister, this could explain both David Cameron’s lacklustre campaigning and Ed Miliband’s curious statement last night on Question Time: neither one wants to be Prime Minister.

However, this does seem improbable to me.

Take it as a given: Ed Miliband wants to be Prime Minister.

Yet, on Question Time on 30th April, with just a week to go to the election, he seemed to reject the job:

“I am not going to have a Labour government if it means deals or coalitions with the Scottish National Party.”

“If the price of having a Labour government is a deal or coalition with the SNP, it’s not going to happen.”

What was Miliband thinking?

Well, in part, he was certainly thinking: the election isn’t over til 10pm Thursday 7th May. Right up until the last vote cast, both Miliband and Cameron must be hoping against hope that they might win a majority. Electoral Calculus, with the poll of polls from 12th to 29th April gives this as an only 8% probability, but Miliband more than Cameron has some basis for hope that the polls are wrong. SNP candidates might sweep Scotland as the polls have been suggesting: or at the ballot paper voters might decide to vote in favour of the incumbent Labour MP rather than the new SNP candidate.

(Interestingly, given the headlines proclaiming a sweeping SNP victory in April and that the SNP have never had more than 11 MPs at Westminster before, if the SNP won 29 constituencies and Labour won 29 constituencies both parties could then claim that as a thundering victory… and the LibDems could be chuffed that despite everything they still kept one MP.)

But once the votes are counted and the results are in, despite all their previous hopes, Ed Miliband and David Cameron are faced with the old Parliamentary rules about hung parliaments, the new rules set by the Fixed Parliament Act, and the inexorable House of Commons arithmetic that says they must have 323 MPs to vote for their Queen’s Speech in order to pass their legislative plan and form their government.

Parliament returns on Monday 18th May: David Cameron and Ed Miliband have 10 days to form a government. But the hard deadline is that on Wednesday 27th May is the State Opening of Parliament and the Queen’s Speech: and a majority of MPs must vote for the Speech to accept the government’s proposed legislative programme.

Not even the most optimistic polling result – showing a high for the Tories of 315 or a high for Labour of 304 – gives either party a majority.

Conservative government – not likely

David Cameron gets first chance as incumbent Prime Minister. If, as Electoral Calculus suggests today, he has 280 Tory MPs, he might be able to get 27 LibDem votes, perhaps as many as 3 UKIP votes, and certainly no more than 10 DUP votes. That still falls 3 short of the bare minimum Cameron needs, and support from two out of three is a bit shaky.

The DUP have made clear they will support either Labour or Tory, whichever makes them the better offer (“We are in contact with all parties. We would go and see Labour and Ed Miliband on such terms.”) If Nick Clegg loses his seat, the LibDems are unlikely to rush into a new coalition deal with the Tories and Nick Clegg has ruled out any coalition that includes UKIP or the SNP. And while UKIP would probably support the Tories unconditionally if it came to that, they’re not likely to have enough MPs to make a difference.

So much for Cameron: unless Tories and LibDems both do unexpectedly better than likely, winning swing seats from Labour and hanging on to incumbent MPs in Scotland, he’ll have to give up on the idea of forming a government.

Can Labour form a government?

Ed Miliband’s prospects of being Prime Minister looked much more solid than Cameron’s until last night.

True, Labour appears likely to have only 275 MPs – fewer MPs than the Conservative Party. But as leader of the largest single party in Opposition, once Cameron has tried and failed to form a government out of the Tories, LibDems, UKIP, and DUP, Ed Miliband will be invited to do so.

According to Electoral Calculus, the SNP will have 55 MPs. The Parliamentary arithmetic is clear: 275+55=330 is a Commons majority. Plaid Cymru will have 3 and the Green Party 1 MP: those four are likely to vote with the SNP.

Further, Miliband has a security that Cameron does not have: if the SNP have fewer MPs than polls currently predict, that effectively means that Labour will have more MPs than current polling predicts. For the most part, a seat not gained by the SNP, is a seat retained by Labour. Nicola Sturgeon has made repeated public promises that the SNP will support Labour to lock the Tories out of government, no messing around with Tory deals. That 330-MP majority was looking very solid: we could begin to consider the advantages of a Labour government with SNP support. (Energy policy looks interesting.)

Until Ed Miliband said he wouldn’t have it.

What is Ed Miliband thinking, aside from the improbable dream that maybe Santa Claus will give him a Labour majority in the Commons on 8th May because he’s been a good boy?

The London-centric media and the Tories – and Scottish Labour – have repeatedly been claiming that SNP support would make a Labour minority government illegitimate: that the English voters don’t want the SNP.

And the SNP hasn’t helped. Nicola Sturgeon has made calm public promises to support Labour and lock the Tories out of government: the SNP campaign has – in a phrase repeated to me many times – claimed that Labour and the Tories are so close there’s now “not a fag papers worth of difference between them“. This isn’t true: if you look at actual policies, the SNP and Labour are as close as Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire: the Tories and UKIP are away over to the right.

But Ed Miliband wants to be Prime Minister (or so we must hope) and he can do the Commons arithmetic as well as we can: he can’t be Prime Minister without SNP support. What will he do, between 8th and 27th May, if the Tories have five more MPs than Labour and are busily doing deals with LibDems, UKIP, and DUP – while Ed Miliband has foolishly promised Labour won’t do deals with the only party that can give Labour a majority?

The media problem

THE Sun in England and ScotlandBear in mind that since Ed Miliband announced that a Labour government would abolish non-dom tax avoidance the non-dom owners of most of the major British newspapers have decided they don’t want a Labour government after all: Rupert Murdoch got The Sun to come out in favour of the Tories in England and the SNP in Scotland, anything to avoid a pro-Labour front page.

(Besides non-dom tax status, Murdoch doesn’t want Labour to be in government because of fear that Labour will finally force News International to break up its business model of media control.)

Labour government with or without SNP support will have no backing from the tabloids: the popular press will argue, spurred by their non-dom ownership, that if the Tories have the most MPs and are putting together a coalition, they have to be in government: even if the SNP have publicly guaranteed they’ll vote with Labour against the Conservative Party’s Queen’s Speech.

Dramatic vote against the Queen’s Speech?

Frank Capra: Mr Smith Goes To WashingtonIs Ed Miliband really envisaging that he can sit tight for 19 days doing nothing while the Tories form a government – and then muster his Labour MPs to vote against the Queen’s Speech on 27th May and expect the SNP to vote with them? (I’m sure the SNP would.) That would be a very dramatic moment – worthy of a Frank Capra movie – but it’s not the way Westminster tends to do things.

If Labour and the SNP forced the Conservatives to resign on 27th May, Ed Miliband would certainly have to do deals with the SNP: under the new Fixed-Term Parliament legislation, if a government loses a vote of no confidence (and a dramatic vote against the Queen’s Speech would certainly trigger one) the government or the opposition have 14 days to form another government: certainly Labour and the SNP could form a government (just as they could between 8th and 18th May) but if Miliband means what he’s said, he can’t form a government.

Well, there’s one thing and there’s another. We could assume Ed Miliband doesn’t want to be Prime Minister, he’d rather see David Cameron in Downing Street for another five years: we could assume Ed Miliband is wilfully hoping for a Labour majority or at least for Labour to have more MPs than the Conservatives: but I honestly think the answer’s much simpler.

When Ed Miliband says “If the price of having a Labour government is a deal or coalition with the SNP, it’s not going to happen” – he’s putting a politician’s construction on the word “deal”. Which is to say: he’s lying.

At least, I hope so.

5 Comments

Filed under Corruption, Elections, GE2015, Politics, Unanswerable Questions

5 responses to “Does Ed Miliband want to be Prime Minister?

  1. Wintergreen

    There’s three options he could go for:

    1. Formal coalition
    2. A confidence & supply deal
    3. Minority government (presumably with vote-by-vote support from SNP)

    Miliband is indicating he would go for option 3. I don’t think it’s unfair or lying to call that a no-deal option.

    • The SNP, and then Labour, rejected option 1 – no coalition.

      The SNP would probably still be open to a formal confidence-and-supply deal, and if Labour has fewer MPs than the Conservatives that would be the sensible option.

      Miliband had already let himself be bullied into saying he wouldn’t accept option 2, but on Thursday he went further and said no deals with the SNP at all. That also rules out option 3, as Miliband made clear: no Labour government because he won’t talk to the SNP.

      I presume Miliband was lying because I do, as I outlined here, find it hard to believe that Miliband really would prefer a minority Conservative government to Labour with SNP support.

    • To be clear: to form a government, Miliband has to be able to indicate that he has “the confidence of the House” – he has to be able to say definitely that he can get his legislative programme in the Queen’s Speech accepted by majority vote.

      Assuming that the polls are correct and that the Conservative MPs can outvote the Labour MPs, he has to be able to say “I know that I can pass my legislative programme because I have spoken to party leaders X, X, and Y, and they have committed their MPs to voting for my legislative programme.”

      Now that’s a deal with the SNP. If Miliband won’t do that, then what is he going to say? “I’m sure the SNP will vote for my legislative programme because I’ve read in the papers they prefer Labour to the Tories, but as I promised I wouldn’t, I haven’t actually spoken to any of them.”

      Meanwhile Cameron has left himself free to talk to any party he wants to and make any deal he can.

  2. Wintergreen

    I stand by what I wrote above. A “deal” is acknowledged in the media to be shorthand for C&S (which I imagine is considered too jargony for him to say to the general public). But if you want to interpret “deal” in a different way and then consider him to be lying, so be it – the outcome is the same either way.

    • A “deal” is acknowledged in the media to be shorthand for C&S

      I hope you’re right and Miliband is planning to announce he was personally interpreting “no deal” as meaning “no confidence-and-supply deal”, not – as he actually said – no deal at all.

      If so, he’s just given himself a reputation for blustering dishonesty: but it would be worse if he honestly meant it and planned to let in a Tory government rather than deal with the SNP.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s