Nicola Sturgeon and Steve Bell

Steve Bell’s shtick is picking a comparator for a politician whom he knows he’s going to have to draw a lot. Nick Clegg as cardboard figure with massive chin. Edwina Currie as giant chicken. John Prescott as a toothless bulldog. Nicola Sturgeon has just become one of those politicians, as the very-soon-to-be First Minister of Scotland.

Edwina Currie said of him a few years ago:

He’s never kind, never affectionate. So it can feel hurtful. Afterwards, you realise it’s very funny and clever, but at the time you feel miffed that your enormous contribution to the country is not being recognised. Does it make you feel better when you see your political rivals skewered? Oh yes!

Steve Bell is a remarkable talent. I’m not in the least surprised at his longevity. Long may he continue.

So, Steve Bell might have picked something offensive, it might have been funny, it might have been clarifying or illuminating or silly, but the shtick Steve Bell seems to have chosen for Nicola Sturgeon is… Hitler.

Nicola Sturgeon is, apparently, going to be a fem Hitler in Steve Bell’s cartoons from now on. (I could be wrong about this: Bell’s possibly going in some other direction. Steve Bell’s a complex cartoonist, and I write this with some trepidation, because in ten days time it seems entirely possible that I’ll look back on this blogpost and go “sheesh, why didn’t I spot THAT?”) But that’s the way it looks to me right now.

Scottish Labour supporter explains why Nicola Sturgeon is like Hitler and the SNP are like the NazisI queried the appropriateness in a comment and on Twitter, and I got this response from a Scottish Labour supporter. (Who I then blocked. We’d interacted before.)

Fairly clearly, this is not a good angle for Scottish Labour to take on Nicola Sturgeon, but I don’t see this as a party angle: this is just one not-particularly-pleasant guy – I’ve encountered many not-particularly-pleasant campaigners for all parties (except of course the Scottish Greens, who tend towards being relentlessly nice in a way no other party seems to be able to duplicate). To any Scottish Labour supporter with sense, comparing the SNP to the Nazis is as far from being a good electoral strategy as Berwick is from Lerwick.

But that this unpleasant guy gets Steve Bell’s “joke”: Nicola Sturgeon is like Hitler because – that’s discomforting.

(I’d like to think that Steve Bell is just being sexist, can’t cope with a female First Minister: but I fear he may actually be that ignorant about the SNP, and may be cartooning out of uninformed beliefs about the SNP and confusion about their appeal to Scots, rather than his usual razor-sharp it’s-funny-because-it’s-true.)

(To digress a little into the Scottish Labour leadership campaign: I was told when I said I’d rather Neil Findlay or Sarah Boyack for Scottish Labour leader, not Jim Murphy (who can’t be an MSP til May 2016, and who may not be an MP after May 2015) that as I wasn’t a Labour member or voter obviously I wouldn’t have the same view as a proper Labour supporter (Labour party members in Scotland seem to be endorsing Jim Murphy). I pointed out that I’d voted for Malcolm Chisholm, my Scottish Labour MSP, in 2011: I’d voted Labour (if rather reluctantly, as least-of-four-evils) in 2010. And I voted No in September 2014. But I can’t vote Labour in May 2015, because it would mean voting for an MP who voted for the Tory welfare cap in March this year, and I won’t do that. I have no enthusiasm for Ed Miliband’s Labour Party, which endorsed both workfare and retrospective legislation making it lawful to have sanctioned thousands of the poorest people in the country, but a leftward-leaning MP might have persuaded me they were, again, the lesser of four evils. If I feel anything about the Labour Party right now, I feel sad that they decided they didn’t need my vote and so didn’t bother to oppose the Tories on the major issues of workfare and welfare. I cannot stomach a party that sets a three-line Whip to support Tory policies, and that’s the end of it. I don’t think I’m unusual in Scotland or among left-wing former Labour supporters, either.)

I’d be the first to admit that I don’t see the SNP as really a left-wing party, though it certainly includes some left-wing politicians and has drifted to the left in opposition to the Tories, while Labour’s done exactly the reverse. And fairly obviously, the SNP is a nationalist party, but not a racist or sectarian nationalism: the SNP’s policy for decades has been that if you identify as Scottish, born or living in Scotland, you are Scottish, and no nonsense about ancestry or tartan or clans or language.

The SNP are a nationalist party who are gaining votes in Scotland from Labour not because of a drift to nationalism – 55% voted against independence in the biggest turnout on record for fifty years – but because the SNP are strongly in opposition to the Tory/LibDem government, and Labour aren’t. The strongest, most consistent, most compelling theme in Scottish politics since at least the 1980s wasn’t nationalism and still isn’t: it’s “Kick the Tories out”. The LibDems are dying in Scotland as a party because in Westminster they’re propping up a Tory government, and that Scots find unforgiveable.

The distance between Berwick and Lerwick is one letter and over four hundred miles.

For Labour, either Scottish Labour or UK Labour, to try to campaign against the SNP on the basis that Labour’ll be doing things almost the same as the Tories just a little nicer (which seems to be Ed Miliband’s consistent strategy) is not a winning strategy.

For Labour to confuzzedly assume they must be losing because Scots are becoming more nationalist rather than because Scots vote leftward and Labour is drifting rightward, is the kind of folly that would turn north from Edinburgh and catch a ferry if where you wanted to go was Berwick-on-Tweed.

But Steve Bell is not obliged to campaign for any party, and indeed doesn’t: one of the things I generally like about him is that he relentlessly mocks them all. If he wants to mock the SNP by comparing them to the Nazis, it’s a free country, he’s allowed… it’s just not funny.

4 Comments

Filed under Elections, Scottish Politics, Women

4 responses to “Nicola Sturgeon and Steve Bell

  1. Jennie Kermode

    I don’t think there’s necessarily a drift toward nationalism. I do think that the referendum and subsequent polling point to a clear drift toward demand for extensive further devolution, and that Labour has rather misjudged that situation, which is part of the reason why it’s struggling now.

    Unless Steve Bell is doing something as yet invisibly clever, I can only assume that he is exhibiting cluelessness, and I find that far more offensive than the caricature itself, because it suggests that he thinks he has a right to satirise Scottish politics that is free of any obligation to pay serious attention to it. Which he does, of course, technically, but only at the expense of his right to ongoing respect.

    • I would like to believe that Steve Bell is being invisibly clever, because he’s always seemed to be a topnotch political cartoonist. I await future developments in that respect.

  2. David Agnew

    I think that poor old Scottish labour – some hilarious tweets doing the rounds, where they are attacking Owen Jones for Scottish labour’s “self destruction” – have made the same strategic error that Thatcher made back in 78. A very narrow win taken as a much more secure win, leading to the notion that she could ignore, marginalise and pretty much stop listening to Scotland altogether. Curran attacks the minimum wage – labour defends the loss of jobs it declared the union could save as being perfectly reasonable, and that demands for more powers are a “Tory” trap. Going by polls today, Scottish labour look to be given the same drubbing that was dished out to the conservatives.

    Gerry Hassan is going to have to rewrite his “not so strange death of labour Scotland”

  3. keaton

    The “national socialist” jibe must be as old as the SNP. It’s the same level of comedy as going on about “Liebore”. I don’t see how it’s sexist (or racist, as some folk BTL are claiming) – it’s just a past-it old hack phoning it in.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s